Type of Submission

Poster

Keywords

Heavy liquid separation, lithium metatungstate, glacial till prospecting, heavy indicator minerals, Wisconsinan glaciation

Abstract

Glacial till (drift) prospecting has served a major role in corporate mineral exploration, especially for gold and diamond during the past 30 years. It involves analyzing heavy indicator minerals from bulk sampling of various glacial deposits in order to track up ice flow direction to the potential orebody (such as a kimberlite pipe or Cu-Ni deposit), a technique commonly used in Canada but not in the U.S. Heavy minerals including diamond, gold, and native copper have been found in Ohio glacial till; the provenance of these heavy minerals is the Precambrian bedrock north of Ohio. This study utilized standard procedures in sample collection and analysis (sieving, concentration by gold-panning, heavy liquid separation with lithium metatungstate [LMT], magnetic separation and microscopy) with seven samples from a kame of the Late Wisconsinan glaciation in northeastern Greene County, southwest Ohio. Coarse to very coarse sand (2 - 0.5 mm) and fine to medium sand (0.5 - 0.125 mm) fractions from each bulk sample were analyzed for heavy minerals and felsic (quartz and feldspars) concentration. The goal was to determine variability in heavy minerals and felsic component concentrations across samples and between grain-size fractions, in order to suggest improved sampling and analysis techniques.

A variety of heavy minerals, including gold, of igneous and metamorphic provenance were identified in all sample fractions by physical and optical (including fluorescence) properties. Zircon concentration in the fine to medium sand fraction appeared similar across concentrated samples. Statistical analysis showed: significant variation of the coarser to finer grain size ratio between samples, displaying the expected variability in sand sizes in a kame deposit; significant differences in the felsic concentration within each grain size fraction across samples and between size fractions within samples. Taken together, results suggest glacial kame deposits can be useful repositories of heavy indicator minerals, yet due to sediment variability extensive sampling is required if kame deposits are to be used as benchmarks in till prospecting en route to an orebody.

Faculty Sponsor or Advisor’s Name

Dr. John Whitmore

Campus Venue

Stevens Student Center

Location

Cedarville, OH

Start Date

4-1-2015 11:00 AM

End Date

4-1-2015 2:00 PM

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Included in

Glaciology Commons

Share

COinS
 
Apr 1st, 11:00 AM Apr 1st, 2:00 PM

Glacial Till Prospecting in Southwest Ohio: Implications for Improved Sampling

Cedarville, OH

Glacial till (drift) prospecting has served a major role in corporate mineral exploration, especially for gold and diamond during the past 30 years. It involves analyzing heavy indicator minerals from bulk sampling of various glacial deposits in order to track up ice flow direction to the potential orebody (such as a kimberlite pipe or Cu-Ni deposit), a technique commonly used in Canada but not in the U.S. Heavy minerals including diamond, gold, and native copper have been found in Ohio glacial till; the provenance of these heavy minerals is the Precambrian bedrock north of Ohio. This study utilized standard procedures in sample collection and analysis (sieving, concentration by gold-panning, heavy liquid separation with lithium metatungstate [LMT], magnetic separation and microscopy) with seven samples from a kame of the Late Wisconsinan glaciation in northeastern Greene County, southwest Ohio. Coarse to very coarse sand (2 - 0.5 mm) and fine to medium sand (0.5 - 0.125 mm) fractions from each bulk sample were analyzed for heavy minerals and felsic (quartz and feldspars) concentration. The goal was to determine variability in heavy minerals and felsic component concentrations across samples and between grain-size fractions, in order to suggest improved sampling and analysis techniques.

A variety of heavy minerals, including gold, of igneous and metamorphic provenance were identified in all sample fractions by physical and optical (including fluorescence) properties. Zircon concentration in the fine to medium sand fraction appeared similar across concentrated samples. Statistical analysis showed: significant variation of the coarser to finer grain size ratio between samples, displaying the expected variability in sand sizes in a kame deposit; significant differences in the felsic concentration within each grain size fraction across samples and between size fractions within samples. Taken together, results suggest glacial kame deposits can be useful repositories of heavy indicator minerals, yet due to sediment variability extensive sampling is required if kame deposits are to be used as benchmarks in till prospecting en route to an orebody.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.