Science and Mathematics Faculty Publications
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-15-1999
Journal Title
Journal of Experimental Biology
Volume
202
Issue
4
First Page
407
Last Page
416
Abstract
Micromolar concentrations of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and its non-hydrolyzable analog β- γ -methylene ATP are both effective depolarizing chemorepellents in Tetrahymena thermophila. Chemorepellent behavior consists of repeated bouts of backward swimming (avoidance reactions) that can easily be quantified to provide a convenient bioassay for purinergic reception studies. Chemosensory adaptation occurs following prolonged exposure (10 min) to the repellents, and cells regain normal swimming behavior. Adaptation is specific since cells that are behaviorally adapted to either ATP or β- γ -methylene ATP still retain full responsiveness to the chemorepellents GTP and lysozyme. However, cross adaptation occurs between ATP and β- γ -methylene ATP, suggesting that they involve the same receptor. Behavioral sensitivity to both ATP and β- γ -methylene ATP is increased by the addition of Na+, but addition of either Ca2+ or Mg2+ dramatically decreases the response to ATP. These ionic effects are correlated with in vivo ATP hydrolysis, suggesting that divalent ions decrease purinergic sensitivity by activating a Ca2+- or Mg2+-dependent ecto-ATPase to hydrolyze the ATP signal. In vivo [32P]ATP binding studies and Scatchard analysis suggest that the behavioral adaptation is due to a decrease in the number of surface binding sites, as represented by decreased Bmax values. All these changes are reversible (de-adaptation) after 12 min in a repellent-free buffer. Electrophysiological analysis showed that both β- γ -methylene ATP (10 micromol l-1) and ATP (500 micromol l-1) elicited sustained, reversible depolarizations while GTP (10 micromol l-1) produced a transient depolarization, suggesting that the chemosensory response pathways for ATP and GTP reception may differ. There may be separate ATP and GTP receptors since ATP and GTP responses do not cross-adapt and ‘cold’ (unlabeled) GTP is not a good inhibitor of [32P]ATP binding. These results suggests that T. thermophila possess high-affinity surface receptors for ATP that are down-regulated during chemosensory adaptation. These ATP receptors may act as chemorepellent receptors to enable T. thermophila to recognize recently lysed cells and avoid a possibly deleterious situation. This is the simplest eukaryotic organism to show an electrophysiological response to external ATP.
Keywords
chemorepellent, chemosensory adaptation, desensitization, down-regulation, ecto-ATPase, P2 receptor, Tetrahymena thermophila.
Recommended Citation
Kim, M. Y., Kuruvilla, H. G., Raghu, S., & Hennessey, T. M. (1999). ATP reception and chemosensory adaptation in Tetrahymena thermophila. Journal of Experimental Biology, 202, 407-416.