Pharmacy Practice Faculty Presentations

Evaluation of Student Confidence of Science Between Didactic and Team-based Learning Formats

Rebecca J. Gryka, Cedarville University
Tracy R. Frame, Cedarville University
Mary E. Kiersma, Manchester University
Aleda M.H. Chen, Cedarville University
Lorin Sheppard, Manchester University
Stephanie M. Cailor, Cedarville University


Objectives: To evaluate student perceptions of science between didactic and team-based learning (TBL) formats at two universities.

Method: A 21-item instrument was administered at the beginning and conclusion of a biochemistry course at two universities (one TBL, one didactic). The instrument examined student perceptions of science utilizing the theory of planned behavior (TPB) domains of perceived behavioral control, subjective norm, and attitude (13 questions, 7- point, Likert-type, 1=Strongly Agree,7=Strongly Disagree) as well as confidence in learning science concepts (8 questions, 5-point, Likert-type, Not at all confident to Extremely confident). Pre-post assessments were evaluated using paired t-tests and differences between universities were evaluated using independent t-tests.

Results: The TBL university (N=53, 100% response) and the didactic university (N=58, 92% response) students completed both instruments. There were significant differences in baseline responses on one perception (e.g. apply science knowledge in my future career) and one confidence question (e.g. apply knowledge of mechanisms and dysregulation to disease management) (p

Implications: Based on the results, TBL and didactic/lecture in a biochemistry course were equivalent in improving student perceptions and confidence in learning science concepts. Either approach could be considered based on faculty preference.