Institution/Affiliation
Caplan & Earnest, Attorneys at Law
Keywords
Theology, religion, bioethics, Roman Catholicism, persistent vegetative state (PVS), artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH), Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services (ERD).
Abstract
This paper discusses the methods used in Catholic Social Teaching (CST), a part of the Catholic Moral Tradition (CMT), as applied to bioethical problem solving and decision-making. In order to apply CST to a concrete bioethical problem and to analyze the methods used in CST, the nature and extent of the obligation to provide artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) to patients in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) is addressed. In particular, this paper focuses upon the extent to which providing ANH to PVS patients is or should be considered morally obligatory. In this discussion, the current official view of the Roman Catholic Church (Church) is reviewed, as evidenced for the United States by the changes made in 2009 to Directive 58 of the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services (ERD), as well as contrary viewpoints. This paper argues that the methodology of CST, which includes the balancing of benefits and burdens, is a practical and ethical way to resolve difficult bioethical cases, including those where care decisions need to be made for patients in a PVS, defending against concerns that have been raised by some in or speaking for the Church about the withdrawal of ANH from PVS patients.
Article Number
4
DOI
10.15385/jbfp.2016.2.1.4
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Recommended Citation
Smith, Gregory J.
(2016)
"Method in Catholic Bioethics: ANH and PVS Patients,"
Bioethics in Faith and Practice: Vol. 2:
No.
1, Article 4.
DOI: 10.15385/jbfp.2016.2.1.4
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/bioethics_in_faith_and_practice/vol2/iss1/4
Disclaimer
DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to dc@cedarville.edu.
Included in
Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Catholic Studies Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons