Business Administration Faculty Publications
Institutional Ownership of Dual-Class Companies
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-19-2021
Journal Title
Journal of Financial Economic Policy
ISSN
1757-6385
Volume
13
Issue
2
First Page
206
Last Page
222
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-04-2020-0061
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to examine institutional ownership of companies that go public with dual-class share structures.
Design/methodology/approach
Several recent studies have discussed the potential advantages and disadvantages of the dual-class structure, which allows founders and insiders to maintain control of the firms they created through superior voting rights. Institutional investors oppose the dual-class structure, arguing that inferior voting rights make it difficult to respond to poor governance or performance. Previous research has shown the early value-added to the dual-class firm declines through time. This study examines institutional ownership of dual-class companies through time and compares institutional investments in initial public offerings with perpetual superior-class structures versus those with provisions to sunset those shares to one-share, one-vote structures.
Findings
Evidence suggests that institutional investors view perpetual dual-class structures as potentially riskier in terms of poor governance or performance and prefer dual-class companies with sunset provisions.
Originality/value
This study suggests that founders and insiders should consider either the dual-class structure with a sunset provision or if they choose the perpetual dual-class, it should include some type of event-driven safeguards.
Keywords
Investments, investment decisions, firm management
Recommended Citation
Burson, Jonathan J. and Jensen, Marlin, "Institutional Ownership of Dual-Class Companies" (2021). Business Administration Faculty Publications. 188.
https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/business_administration_publications/188