Proposal
Many constitutional bases exist to support creationists' right to disseminate creation science evidences in public educational and other forums. These evidences have a scientific purpose and effect and do not advance religion In contravention of the Establishment Clause. Balanced Treatment laws, as statutory compilations of these constitutional guarantees, will be ruled constitutional in early 1987 by the Supreme Court If proper weight Is given to these scientific evidences. First Amendment adjudication precluding government partisanship, discrimination and censorship In the area of origins will increase as the evolutionary establishment intensifies its efforts to extirpate the creationist version of origins. Some instruction as a means of ensuring the teaching and receiving of creation science information, is a burgeoning alternative to public education.
Keywords
Creationism, creation science, law
Print Reference
Volume 1:I, Page 167-176
Disclaimer
DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to dc@cedarville.edu.
Recommended Citation
Melnick, Robert Russell
(1986)
"Trends in Constitutional Law; Teaching and Dissemination of Creation Science,"
Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 1, Article 29.
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol1/iss1/29