The Case for the Septuagint’s Chronology in Genesis 5 and 11

Authors

Henry B. Smith Jr, Associates for Biblical ResearchFollow

Addresses of All Authors

PO Box 144 Akron, PA 17501

Author's Biography

Henry B. Smith Jr. is the Administrative Director of the Shiloh and Ai Archaeological Excavations, Israel for the Associates for Biblical Research (ABR). He graduated with a B.A. in Economics from Rutgers in 1992. With a 13-year business background, he earned an M.A. in Theology with an emphasis on Apologetics from Trinity Seminary, graduating with high honors in 2005. He earned his M.A.R. from Westminster Theological Seminary in 2015. Henry is presently ABR’s lead researcher for the Genesis 5 and 11 Research Project, found online at www.BibleArchaeology.org.

Proposal

Many biblical scholars who interpret the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 as yielding a continuous chronology from Adam to Abraham claim the Hebrew Masoretic Text (MT) preserves the original begetting ages for the patriarchs. The MT’s total for this period is 2008 years. The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) presents markedly different chronological data for each epoch, for a grand total of 2249 years. Calculations derived from the primary manuscripts (MSS) of the Greek Septuagint (LXX) yield a chronology of 3394 years for this period, 1386 years greater than the MT. The MT is classically represented by the Ussher chronology, which places creation at 4004 BC and the Flood at 2348 BC. Figures from the LXX place creation at ca. 5554 BC and the Flood at ca. 3298 BC (Table 1; Appendix, n. 1).

This paper proposes that the LXX preserves (most of) the original numbers in Genesis 5 and 11. Most of the MT’s chronology in Genesis 5 and 11 does not represent the original text, and is the result of a deliberate and systematic post–AD 70 corruption. Corroborating external witnesses, internal and external evidence, text critical and LXX studies, and historical testimonies will be presented, along with arguments rebutting LXX inflation hypotheses. Explanations for important, accidental scribal errors will be discussed, and a text critical reconstruction of Genesis 5 and 11 will be proposed.

Keywords

Genesis 5 and 11, Primeval Chronology, LXX, MT, SP, Genealogy, Josephus, Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum (LAB)

DOI

https://doi.org/10.15385/jpicc.2018.8.1.14

Print Reference

Pages 117-132

Disclaimer

DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to dc@cedarville.edu.

Recommended Citation

Smith, H.B., Jr. 2018. The case for the Septuagint’s chronology in Genesis 5 and 11. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H. Whitmore, pp. 117–132. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship.