Pharmacy Practice Faculty Publications
Generosity, Collegiality, and Scientific Accuracy When Writing and Reviewing Original Research
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-2020
Journal Title
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume
16
Issue
2
First Page
261
Last Page
265
DOI
10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.04.054
Abstract
In spite of concerns about the lack of recognition for its conduct, peer review remains the backbone of scientific evaluation and advancement of scientific knowledge. Given the challenges and evolution in the peer review system, collegiality among authors, reviewers, editors, and even consumers of content is more important than ever. While general guidance has been provided recently in the pharmacy literature, this commentary provides both philosophical underpinnings and specific mechanics for enhancing effectiveness of reviews and improving the quality of writing for authors concurrently, thus examining each major section in an original research contribution. Generosity, courtesy, diligence, thoroughness, and empathy are required of us all to advance the scientific paradigm of our discipline and profession.
Keywords
Generosity, collegiality, scientific accuracy, writing, reviewing, original research
Recommended Citation
Desselle, Shane P.; Chen, Aleda; Amin, Mohamed; Aslani, Parisa; Dawoud, Dalia; Miller, Michael J.; and Norgaard, Lotte Stig, "Generosity, Collegiality, and Scientific Accuracy When Writing and Reviewing Original Research" (2020). Pharmacy Practice Faculty Publications. 414.
https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/pharmacy_practice_publications/414