Type of Submission

Poster

Keywords

Physician assisted suicide, terminal illness, death with dignity, Kantian ethics, virtue ethics, autonomy, exploitation

Abstract

United States health care is intentionally moving in a direction which emphasizes patient autonomy. This mentality has caused some patients to seek control over their own death when faced with a terminal illness. Claiming the right to “death with dignity,” patients exercise the method of physician assisted suicide in order to avoid the inevitable suffering that comes along with certain disease progressions. Is such medical practice ethical? Should a patient have the choice to end her own life rather than experience the devastating pain that comes with a terminal illness? Could physician assisted suicide evolve to encompass putting to an end more than physical pain, such as psychological suffering, or physical or mental disabilities?

In this presentation, I will demonstrate how physician assisted suicide is a fateful pattern that should be resisted for several reasons. With an evaluation of Kantian ethics, I will suggest that health care professionals should not promote physician assisted suicide in clinical practice nor encourage terminally ill patients to choose this option when facing end of life circumstances. I will discuss how physician assisted suicide violates Kant’s first and second categorical imperatives and affirm why we should adhere to this assertion when considering ethical matters; to do so, I will explore the significance of virtue ethics and show how these principles are relevant when considering ethical dilemmas. In addition, I will present the concepts of autonomy and duty from a Kantian perspective and relate these to physician assisted suicide. Further, I will suggest potential implications of allowing “death with dignity” considering the slippery slope argument while using a case study to support the validity of this claim. Finally, I will emphasize how physician assisted suicide is likely to exploit vulnerable populations and make a final claim as to why this practice should be considered unethical.

Faculty Sponsor or Advisor’s Name

Dr. Dennis Sullivan

Campus Venue

Stevens Student Center

Location

Cedarville, OH

Start Date

4-1-2015 11:00 AM

End Date

4-1-2015 2:00 PM

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

PAS References.pdf (11 kB)
Presentation References

Share

COinS
 
Apr 1st, 11:00 AM Apr 1st, 2:00 PM

Physician Assisted Suicide: Promoting Death with Dignity or Empowering Exploitation?

Cedarville, OH

United States health care is intentionally moving in a direction which emphasizes patient autonomy. This mentality has caused some patients to seek control over their own death when faced with a terminal illness. Claiming the right to “death with dignity,” patients exercise the method of physician assisted suicide in order to avoid the inevitable suffering that comes along with certain disease progressions. Is such medical practice ethical? Should a patient have the choice to end her own life rather than experience the devastating pain that comes with a terminal illness? Could physician assisted suicide evolve to encompass putting to an end more than physical pain, such as psychological suffering, or physical or mental disabilities?

In this presentation, I will demonstrate how physician assisted suicide is a fateful pattern that should be resisted for several reasons. With an evaluation of Kantian ethics, I will suggest that health care professionals should not promote physician assisted suicide in clinical practice nor encourage terminally ill patients to choose this option when facing end of life circumstances. I will discuss how physician assisted suicide violates Kant’s first and second categorical imperatives and affirm why we should adhere to this assertion when considering ethical matters; to do so, I will explore the significance of virtue ethics and show how these principles are relevant when considering ethical dilemmas. In addition, I will present the concepts of autonomy and duty from a Kantian perspective and relate these to physician assisted suicide. Further, I will suggest potential implications of allowing “death with dignity” considering the slippery slope argument while using a case study to support the validity of this claim. Finally, I will emphasize how physician assisted suicide is likely to exploit vulnerable populations and make a final claim as to why this practice should be considered unethical.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.